Asylum Granted After Detention & Accelerated Merits Hearing

---

​

Case Overview

This asylum case involved significant procedural and practical challenges. After entering the United States without inspection, our client faced removal proceedings and later detention by ICE—despite full compliance with all legal obligations. The detention occurred shortly before the scheduled merits hearing, severely limiting preparation time and placing substantial emotional strain on our client. Through intensive legal advocacy, continuous coordination with detention officials, and focused preparation under strict time constraints, our firm secured a grant of asylum at the final hearing.

​

Background

When our client retained our firm, he had entered the United States without inspection and was already subject to removal proceedings. Due to the complexity of his experiences and the hardships he endured, preparing a clear and well-documented asylum application required careful attention and substantial effort. Our office prepared and submitted his asylum application to the Immigration Court, ensuring that his claim was presented thoroughly and coherently.

Following the master calendar hearing, the Immigration Court scheduled a final merits hearing. Our firm began preparing the case in full, compiling evidence, affidavits, and supporting documentation in anticipation of the hearing.

Before the merits hearing could take place, however, our client was called by ICE for what was described as a routine check-in and was subsequently taken into custody and transferred to a detention facility. This development occurred despite our client’s compliance with all legal requirements and significantly disrupted the preparation process.

​

Legal Action and Hearing

Our client’s detention had an immediate and serious impact. In addition to the psychological distress caused by incarceration, the court rescheduled the final hearing to a much earlier date, leaving very limited time to finalize the case while our client remained detained.

Throughout this period, our firm provided continuous legal support. Although communication with a detained client was restricted, we maintained regular contact with detention officers and the assigned case manager and made repeated efforts to schedule attorney–client meetings. Through multiple extended legal consultations, we continued preparing the case in close coordination with our client and with his full knowledge and approval.

The process was demanding for our client due to the emotional weight of recounting his experiences, and it required an intensive investment of time and effort from our legal team. Nevertheless, we ensured uninterrupted advocacy and preparation leading up to the merits hearing.

At the final hearing, the Immigration Judge granted asylum. The decision became final without any appeal.

​

Result

Despite detention, limited access to our client, and an accelerated hearing schedule, our firm successfully prepared and presented a complete asylum case. Through sustained legal support, close coordination with detention authorities, and focused advocacy, asylum was granted, and the decision became final, bringing the proceedings to a successful conclusion.